Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vs Pentera
BAS products perform simple tests to a limited extent . They work with agents and perform playbook-based simulations. At this point, Pentera works with adaptive tests in an area covering all systems without any agency .
Automated Penetration Testing (Automated PT) vs Pentera
Many tools are used within the scope of Automated PT, and most of these tools are non-institutional . Additionally, using these tools requires serious expertise . The use of these tools involves some risks and may result in unexpected effects . Pentera constantly provides ethical penetration tests in a reliable manner that will not harm the systems, without requiring additional expertise.
External Attack Surface Management (EASM) vs Pentera
EASM products discover, monitor and security evaluate institutions’ Internet-facing surfaces . EASM has automatic discovery and security assessment of institutions’ internet-exposed assets . Unlike Pentera , it tests the vulnerabilities of institutions’ online assets and checks the validity of leaked accounts .
Vulnerability Management (VM) vs Pentera
Vulnerability Management is the control of vulnerabilities discovered on a defined group of assets. It also includes remediation efforts specified in the CVE for relevant vulnerabilities . Pentera also checks dynamic vulnerabilities such as password-related security problems that are not included in the CVE database . It also verifies these vulnerabilities in a way that eliminates the possibility of them being false-positive .
Because technological conditions are constantly changing, many processes and understandings are also changing. In today’s conditions , Vulnerability Management is no longer sufficient to meet security needs. At this point, Pentera produces significant value in security problems arising from password security, non-patchable vulnerabilities and configuration errors, where Vulnerability Management is inadequate . With pentest automation , it carries out an ethical test on a wider attack surface with the tactics and techniques defined within the MITER framework . The biggest difference of Pentera at this point is that it performs these tests reliably, without any agency or additional tools .
MITER ATT&CK Today
Pentera maps test results onto the MITER ATT&CK framework and is fully compatible with MITER ATT&CK . This feature is invaluable to security professionals. Mapping a completed test result both as an attack map (kill-chain) containing vulnerabilities and on MITER ATT&CK, which includes techniques and tactics , contributes greatly to the evaluation study.